We've been  keeping a very special promotion tightly under wraps for the last week.   Some of you may have been given a few hints or a heads up from the  ArtFire Maven team, who we want to thank profusely for helping us ‘focus  group’ many parts of this deal and who were on hand when we needed help  testing.  A big thanks to our Mavens, we couldn’t have pulled this off  without you.  
ArtFire will be exiting beta  very shortly and to celebrate we’re offering, for a limited time only,  the chance for up to 50,000 members to lock-in a Pro account for  $5.95/month.  The initial deal does have a few conditions; mainly that  we need a minimum of 20,000 people to opt in at the $5.95 rate before we  can give anyone this incredible rate.  We want to be very clear, by  opting in you are not getting a $5.95/month Pro account right away. Your  information is securely stored and will not be charged unless the deal  is on.  If we don’t meet the minimum threshold, nobody gets a $5.95  account, your credit card isn’t charged, and your existing account and  any associated subscriptions will not be affected.  
To  begin, we are opening the offer to existing ArtFire members only  (doesn’t matter if your Pro, or Basic, or if you’ve ever switched  between the two,  or if you signed up ten minutes ago, everyone can lock  in this rate).  To take us up on our offer, visit this page.  We  will have a more "public friendly" page that explains the offer  shortly.  *edit* Here's a link to the page that explains some of the  deal and also encourages members to opt in.  http://www.artfire.com/groupdeal
We  want to make sure all of our current members have a chance to get this  deal before opening the deal up to the general public.  If we get to  50,000 opt-ins before the deal goes public, it will never be offered  publicly.  
I’m sure there will be a mountain  of questions about why we’re discounting our rate such as how we can  afford the discount, and the reasoning behind the decision.  I don’t  want to make this a mile long announcement so I’ve laid out reasoning in  the first reply to this post below.  
No comments:
Post a Comment